Decorative

How is Scotland Performing?

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Scotland has a National Performance Framework (NPF), and you can find out more about it in this key issues briefing from SPICe.

It includes 11 outcomes , and the performance of those outcomes is measured by a total of 81 National Indicators. This blog provides a snapshot of the current performance of the National Indicators, and we plan to update it on the first Monday of the month.

SPICe recently published the blog Review of the National Outcomes 2023 – Back to the future? which looks to provide some background on the NPF, discuss Parliament’s role in scrutinising the National Outcomes and the NPF, and analyse some of the key issues around the NPF that the Scottish Government may look to address.

For example one outcome is all about Children and Young People, and the outcome is that “We grow up loved, safe and respected so that we realise our full potential”. 

So, how is that outcome measured? 

The NPF actually has seven different indicators related to this outcome, and one of these is titled “child social and physical development”, and specifically measures the “the percentage of children with a concern at their 27-30 month review (as a % of children reviewed)”.  The indicator relates to Health Visitors’ assessment of children’s development and the ‘Number of children eligible for review’ is defined as the number of children who turned 27 months old during the financial year of interest (April to March) and who were active on the Scottish Immunisation & Recall System (SIRS).

How do we know if things are getting better, worse or staying the same?

To help simplify a complex array of statistical measures and get a sense of the overall direction of the NPF, each one of the 81 National Indicators is assessed as to whether its performance is improving, maintaining or worsening based on the change between the last two data points.

That decision, for each indicator, is based on its own “Criteria for Change”

For example, If we look at the Criteria for Change for the Economic Growth indicator, we can get an idea of how this works. This indicator measures how well the Scottish economy is growing compared to recent history. It compares Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in the most recent year against the average annual GDP growth across the three previous years.

The Criteria for Change for this Indicator are:  

Performance Improving means: 0.1 percentage points or more higher than the average annual growth rates for the preceding 3 years
Performance Maintaining means: within +/- 0.1 percentage points of the average annual growth rates for the preceding 3 years
Performance Worsening means: 0.1 percentage points or more lower than the average annual growth rates for the preceding 3 years  

So, are things getting better, worse or staying the same?

Updated at 9 April 2024

This section outlines how each of the 81 Indicators is performing.  

The NPF was last refreshed and reviewed in 2018 and indicators are updated as and when new data becomes available. However, it should be noted that, as at 5 March 2024, of the 81 National indicators there is now no data for 17. That leaves us with 64 indicators on which performance has been assessed.

It was not possible to report performance for 17 indicators. This is due to changes in data collection methodology during Covid-19 which is only now becoming apparent in the NPF data. These changes in methodology mean that the current data is not comparable to previous years, thus no performance assessment can be made. We are working with the lead analysts and the Chief Statistician to keep users informed of these reasons on the NPF website and to look ahead to reporting performance again for these indicators as soon as possible. There are also six National Indicators out of 81 that are still in development from 2018.

For surveys like the Scottish Household Survey, the pandemic has had a major impact on how that data has been collected  (details available in this report).  In summary, as set out here, in March 2020, to help prevent the spread of Covid-19, fieldwork for the Scottish Household Survey was suspended. A revised approach was piloted and adopted for the remainder of the 2020 sample. This involved no interviewer travel, and surveys conducted remotely, either by telephone or by video.

As a result, the government says that it has not been possible to determine the extent to which any differences between 2020 and previous years represent genuine changes in people’s views and experiences, as opposed to being due to changes in how the survey was carried out.  This has meant that reporting on these National Indicators has had to change to capture this.

More information can be found on the NPF website.

The big picture

The following chart gives an overview of what is happening with each indicator grouped by its relevant outcomes.

A horizontal stacked bar chart showing the performance of each of the 81 National Indicators grouped by the 11 outcomes. The data for the chart can be found below.

Of the 61 indicators where performance can be measured:

  • 29 show performance maintaining
  • 24 show performance improving
  • 11 show performance worsening

Current gaps in data are notable in Education (no performance data for 4 out of 9 Indicators), Human rights (no performance data for 3 out of 4 indicators), Communities (no data for 2 out of 8 indicators) and for International (no performance data for 3 out of 6 Indicators).

A breakdown by all the National Indicators

The following table provides an overview of what is happening with each indicator grouped by the relevant outcomes.

Children and Young People

Indicator
Performance
Performance Worsening
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance to be confirmed

Communities

Indicator
Performance
Performance Maintaining
Performance to be confirmed
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance to be confirmed
Performance Improving
Performance Worsening

Culture

Indicator
Performance
Performance to be confirmed
Performance to be confirmed
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining

Economy

Indicator
Performance
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining

Education

Indicator
Performance
Performance to be confirmed
Confidence of children and young people
Indicator in development
Resilience of children and young people
Indicator in development
Performance Improving
Engagement in extra-curricular activities
Indicator in development
Performance to be confirmed
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Improving

Environment

Indicator
Performance
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining

Fair Work & Business

Indicator
Performance
Performance Worsening
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening
Performance Worsening
Performance Improving

Health

Indicator
Performance
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Performance Worsening
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening

Human Rights

Indicator
Performance
Performance to be confirmed
Performance to be confirmed
Performance to be confirmed
Performance Maintaining

International

Indicator
Performance
Performance Maintaining
Performance Improving
Performance Improving
Indicator in development
Indicator in development
Performance to be confirmed

Poverty

Indicator
Performance
Performance Maintaining
Performance Worsening
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining
Performance Maintaining
Performance to be confirmed
Performance to be confirmed

Finally, it is worth noting that the Scottish Government has recently been asking users what they think of the National Performance Framework, and a review of the National Outcomes is currently underway. People and organisations from across Scotland told us whether our National Outcomes continue to reflect the kind of Scotland we want to see in our consultation and call for evidence which closed on 12 June. The Scottish Government are currently analysing that data. For more information visit the NPF website.

There’s an NPF newsletter for those who want to keep up to date.

Andrew Aiton, Data Visualisation Manager